误分类风险评估全球工人分类智能 API

API ID 13222

在20个司法管辖区内,根据工作关系的结构化描述评估误分类风险评分(0-100),采用法律测试并逐项推理

API 文档

端点

请求
通过一个司法管辖区的评分引擎运行结构化的工作关系 返回风险分数 风险等级 覆盖范围 因素分解 和推理
Endpoint ID: 27151
POST https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27151/classify+a+single+relationship
输入参数

对单一关系进行分类 — 端点功能

对象 描述
request_body 必需
请求体 必需 Json

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。


输入参数

此端点不需要任何输入参数。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "jurisdictionCode": "US",
        "testName": "IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities)",
        "riskScore": 100,
        "riskLevel": "critical",
        "coverage": 100,
        "presumptionOfEmployment": false,
        "presumptionWarning": null,
        "contractLabelNote": "Contract labels are not determinative. Regulators and courts assess the actual working relationship, not the contract title.",
        "reasoning": "This engagement displays 6 employment indicators under the IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities): behavioural control, financial risk, schedule control, investment in tools, relationship permanency, and multiple clients.",
        "factors": [
            {
                "name": "behavioural_control",
                "question": "Does the company control how the work is performed (behavioral control)?",
                "answer": true,
                "signal": "employee",
                "weight": 25,
                "scoreContribution": 25,
                "explanation": "Instructing the worker on how, when, and where to do the work is the core behavioral control indicator under the IRS common law test."
            },
            {
                "name": "schedule_control",
                "question": "Does the company set or control the worker's hours?",
                "answer": true,
                "signal": "employee",
                "weight": 15,
                "scoreContribution": 15,
                "explanation": "Company-set hours reinforce behavioral control and reduce the worker's independence."
            },
            {
                "name": "financial_risk",
                "question": "Does the worker bear genuine profit-or-loss risk on the engagement?",
                "answer": false,
                "signal": "employee",
                "weight": 20,
                "scoreContribution": 20,
                "explanation": "Absence of profit-or-loss risk is a core financial control indicator supporting employee status."
            },
            {
                "name": "investment_in_tools",
                "question": "Does the worker provide and invest in their own tools or equipment?",
                "answer": false,
                "signal": "employee",
                "weight": 15,
                "scoreContribution": 15,
                "explanation": "Reliance on company-provided tools is a financial control indicator supporting employee status."
            },
            {
                "name": "relationship_permanency",
                "question": "Has the engagement continued for an extended, indefinite-feeling period?",
                "answer": 30,
                "signal": "employee",
                "weight": 15,
                "scoreContribution": 15,
                "explanation": "Long, open-ended engagements point toward an intended ongoing relationship rather than a discrete project."
            },
            {
                "name": "multiple_clients",
                "question": "Does the worker provide similar services to multiple clients in the market?",
                "answer": false,
                "signal": "employee",
                "weight": 10,
                "scoreContribution": 10,
                "explanation": "A worker serving only one company looks more like an employee than an independent business."
            }
        ],
        "penaltySummary": {
            "backPayYears": 3,
            "criminalLiability": false,
            "fineRange": "Varies by agency — IRS penalties plus DOL back-wage awards, typically uncapped"
        }
    },
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false
    }
}
对单一关系进行分类 — 代码片段

curl --location --request POST 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27151/classify+a+single+relationship' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 

--data-raw ''

    
请求
在一次通话中评估最多10个关系,同一个或不同的司法管辖区每个条目都返回详细的因素级别信息
Endpoint ID: 27153
POST https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27153/classify+up+to+10+relationships
输入参数

将最多10种关系进行分类 — 端点功能

对象 描述
request_body 必需
请求体 必需 Json

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。


输入参数

此端点不需要任何输入参数。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "results": [
            {
                "jurisdictionCode": "US",
                "testName": "IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities)",
                "riskScore": 100,
                "riskLevel": "critical",
                "coverage": 25,
                "presumptionOfEmployment": false,
                "presumptionWarning": null,
                "contractLabelNote": "Contract labels are not determinative. Regulators and courts assess the actual working relationship, not the contract title.",
                "reasoning": "This engagement displays 1 employment indicator under the IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities): behavioural control. Only 25% of this jurisdiction's factors were assessed based on the information provided; the remaining factors were excluded from the score.",
                "factors": [
                    {
                        "name": "behavioural_control",
                        "question": "Does the company control how the work is performed (behavioral control)?",
                        "answer": true,
                        "signal": "employee",
                        "weight": 25,
                        "scoreContribution": 25,
                        "explanation": "Instructing the worker on how, when, and where to do the work is the core behavioral control indicator under the IRS common law test."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "schedule_control",
                        "question": "Does the company set or control the worker's hours?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 15,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Company-set hours reinforce behavioral control and reduce the worker's independence."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "financial_risk",
                        "question": "Does the worker bear genuine profit-or-loss risk on the engagement?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 20,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Absence of profit-or-loss risk is a core financial control indicator supporting employee status."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "investment_in_tools",
                        "question": "Does the worker provide and invest in their own tools or equipment?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 15,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Reliance on company-provided tools is a financial control indicator supporting employee status."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "relationship_permanency",
                        "question": "Has the engagement continued for an extended, indefinite-feeling period?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 15,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Long, open-ended engagements point toward an intended ongoing relationship rather than a discrete project."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "multiple_clients",
                        "question": "Does the worker provide similar services to multiple clients in the market?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 10,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "A worker serving only one company looks more like an employee than an independent business."
                    }
                ],
                "penaltySummary": {
                    "backPayYears": 3,
                    "criminalLiability": false,
                    "fineRange": "Varies by agency — IRS penalties plus DOL back-wage awards, typically uncapped"
                }
            },
            {
                "jurisdictionCode": "GB",
                "testName": "IR35 / Off-Payroll Working Rules",
                "riskScore": 0,
                "riskLevel": "low",
                "coverage": 0,
                "presumptionOfEmployment": false,
                "presumptionWarning": null,
                "contractLabelNote": "Contract labels are not determinative. Regulators and courts assess the actual working relationship, not the contract title.",
                "reasoning": "No relationship details were provided, so no risk assessment could be generated under the IR35 / Off-Payroll Working Rules. Provide relationship data to generate a risk analysis.",
                "factors": [
                    {
                        "name": "substitution_right",
                        "question": "Does the worker have a genuine, unfettered right to send a substitute to do the work?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 20,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Absence of substitution right is the strongest single indicator of employment under IR35."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "mutuality_of_obligation",
                        "question": "Is there an ongoing obligation for the company to offer work and the worker to accept it?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 20,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Long-running engagements with an implied obligation to continue create mutuality, a key employee indicator."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "behavioural_control",
                        "question": "Does the company control how and when the work is performed?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 20,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Control over the method of work is a primary employment indicator under IR35."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "integration",
                        "question": "Is the worker integrated into the company's teams, systems, and premises?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 15,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Integration into the business supports employment status."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "financial_risk",
                        "question": "Does the worker bear genuine financial risk?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 15,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Absence of financial risk is an employment indicator."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "exclusivity",
                        "question": "Does the worker work exclusively or predominantly for this one company?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 10,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Single-client contractors are at significantly elevated risk of an employment finding."
                    }
                ],
                "penaltySummary": {
                    "backPayYears": 6,
                    "criminalLiability": false,
                    "fineRange": "Unlimited — HMRC recovers all unpaid tax plus interest"
                }
            }
        ]
    },
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false
    }
}
将最多10种关系进行分类 — 代码片段

curl --location --request POST 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27153/classify+up+to+10+relationships' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 

--data-raw ''

    
请求
对2-5个辖区同时评分一个关系 返回每个辖区的完整结果以及最高/最低/平均摘要
Endpoint ID: 27155
POST https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27155/classify+across+multiple+jurisdictions
输入参数

跨多个司法管辖区分类 — 端点功能

对象 描述
request_body 必需
请求体 必需 Json

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。


输入参数

此端点不需要任何输入参数。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "results": [
            {
                "jurisdictionCode": "US",
                "testName": "IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities)",
                "riskScore": 100,
                "riskLevel": "critical",
                "coverage": 40,
                "presumptionOfEmployment": false,
                "presumptionWarning": null,
                "contractLabelNote": "Contract labels are not determinative. Regulators and courts assess the actual working relationship, not the contract title.",
                "reasoning": "This engagement displays 2 employment indicators under the IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities): behavioural control and schedule control. Only 40% of this jurisdiction's factors were assessed based on the information provided; the remaining factors were excluded from the score.",
                "factors": [
                    {
                        "name": "behavioural_control",
                        "question": "Does the company control how the work is performed (behavioral control)?",
                        "answer": true,
                        "signal": "employee",
                        "weight": 25,
                        "scoreContribution": 25,
                        "explanation": "Instructing the worker on how, when, and where to do the work is the core behavioral control indicator under the IRS common law test."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "schedule_control",
                        "question": "Does the company set or control the worker's hours?",
                        "answer": true,
                        "signal": "employee",
                        "weight": 15,
                        "scoreContribution": 15,
                        "explanation": "Company-set hours reinforce behavioral control and reduce the worker's independence."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "financial_risk",
                        "question": "Does the worker bear genuine profit-or-loss risk on the engagement?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 20,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Absence of profit-or-loss risk is a core financial control indicator supporting employee status."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "investment_in_tools",
                        "question": "Does the worker provide and invest in their own tools or equipment?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 15,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Reliance on company-provided tools is a financial control indicator supporting employee status."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "relationship_permanency",
                        "question": "Has the engagement continued for an extended, indefinite-feeling period?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 15,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Long, open-ended engagements point toward an intended ongoing relationship rather than a discrete project."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "multiple_clients",
                        "question": "Does the worker provide similar services to multiple clients in the market?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 10,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "A worker serving only one company looks more like an employee than an independent business."
                    }
                ],
                "penaltySummary": {
                    "backPayYears": 3,
                    "criminalLiability": false,
                    "fineRange": "Varies by agency — IRS penalties plus DOL back-wage awards, typically uncapped"
                }
            },
            {
                "jurisdictionCode": "GB",
                "testName": "IR35 / Off-Payroll Working Rules",
                "riskScore": 100,
                "riskLevel": "critical",
                "coverage": 20,
                "presumptionOfEmployment": false,
                "presumptionWarning": null,
                "contractLabelNote": "Contract labels are not determinative. Regulators and courts assess the actual working relationship, not the contract title.",
                "reasoning": "This engagement displays 1 employment indicator under the IR35 / Off-Payroll Working Rules: behavioural control. Only 20% of this jurisdiction's factors were assessed based on the information provided; the remaining factors were excluded from the score.",
                "factors": [
                    {
                        "name": "substitution_right",
                        "question": "Does the worker have a genuine, unfettered right to send a substitute to do the work?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 20,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Absence of substitution right is the strongest single indicator of employment under IR35."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "mutuality_of_obligation",
                        "question": "Is there an ongoing obligation for the company to offer work and the worker to accept it?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 20,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Long-running engagements with an implied obligation to continue create mutuality, a key employee indicator."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "behavioural_control",
                        "question": "Does the company control how and when the work is performed?",
                        "answer": true,
                        "signal": "employee",
                        "weight": 20,
                        "scoreContribution": 20,
                        "explanation": "Control over the method of work is a primary employment indicator under IR35."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "integration",
                        "question": "Is the worker integrated into the company's teams, systems, and premises?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 15,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Integration into the business supports employment status."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "financial_risk",
                        "question": "Does the worker bear genuine financial risk?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 15,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Absence of financial risk is an employment indicator."
                    },
                    {
                        "name": "exclusivity",
                        "question": "Does the worker work exclusively or predominantly for this one company?",
                        "answer": null,
                        "signal": "not_assessed",
                        "weight": 10,
                        "scoreContribution": null,
                        "explanation": "Single-client contractors are at significantly elevated risk of an employment finding."
                    }
                ],
                "penaltySummary": {
                    "backPayYears": 6,
                    "criminalLiability": false,
                    "fineRange": "Unlimited — HMRC recovers all unpaid tax plus interest"
                }
            },
            {
                "jurisdictionCode": "DE",
                "testName": "Labour Court Multi-Factor Test",
                "riskScore": 100,
                "riskLevel": "critical",
                "coverage": 35,
                "presumptionOfEmployment": true,
                "presumptionWarning": "This jurisdiction applies a legal presumption of employment. The burden of proof rests with the hiring company to demonstrate genuine self-employment.",
                "contractLabelNote": "Contract labels are not determinative. Regulators and courts assess the actual working relationship, not the contract title.",
                "reasoning": "This engagement displays 2 employment indicators under the Labour Court Multi-Factor Test: personal dependency control and schedule control. Only 35% of this jurisdiction's factors were assessed based on the information provided; the remaining factors were excluded from the score."
            }
        ]
    },
    "_note": "Response truncated for documentation purposes"
}
跨多个司法管辖区分类 — 代码片段

curl --location --request POST 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27155/classify+across+multiple+jurisdictions' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 

--data-raw ''

    
请求
批量轻量级风险评分用于审计整个承包商账册 无效条目通过索引隔离到错误数组中 返回每个工人的结果以及汇总摘要
Endpoint ID: 27157
POST https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27157/classify+a+portfolio+of+up+to+100+workers
输入参数

对多达100名工人的投资组合进行分类 — 端点功能

对象 描述
request_body 必需
请求体 必需 Json

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。


输入参数

此端点不需要任何输入参数。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "results": [
            {
                "workerId": "W1",
                "jurisdictionCode": "US",
                "riskScore": 100,
                "riskLevel": "critical",
                "coverage": 25
            }
        ],
        "errors": [
            {
                "index": 1,
                "workerId": "W2",
                "message": "Unknown jurisdictionCode \"XX\". See GET /jurisdictions for supported codes."
            }
        ],
        "summary": {
            "totalAssessed": 1,
            "byRiskLevel": {
                "low": 0,
                "medium": 0,
                "high": 0,
                "critical": 1
            },
            "averageRiskScore": 100,
            "highestRiskWorkers": [
                {
                    "workerId": "W1",
                    "jurisdictionCode": "US",
                    "riskScore": 100,
                    "riskLevel": "critical",
                    "coverage": 25
                }
            ]
        }
    },
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false
    }
}
对多达100名工人的投资组合进行分类 — 代码片段

curl --location --request POST 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27157/classify+a+portfolio+of+up+to+100+workers' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 

--data-raw ''

    
请求
返回所有20个支持的管辖区,带可选过滤器:区域、执法级别、欧盟平台工作指令、测试名称
Endpoint ID: 27159
GET https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27159/list+jurisdictions
输入参数

列出司法管辖区 — 端点功能

对象 描述
region 可选 Optional. Filter by region: americas, europe, africa, asia, oceania.
enforcementLevel 可选 Optional. Filter by enforcement level: low, medium, high, critical.
euPlatformWorkDirective 可选 Optional. true to return only jurisdictions to which the EU Platform Work Directive applies.
testName 可选 Optional. Filter by exact legal test name.

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。


输入参数

region
enforcementLevel
euPlatformWorkDirective
testName
API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": [
        {
            "jurisdictionCode": "FR",
            "countryName": "France",
            "region": "europe",
            "testName": "Economic Dependence + Criminal Liability",
            "enforcementLevel": "critical",
            "presumptionOfEmployment": true,
            "euPlatformWorkDirective": true,
            "lastUpdated": "2026-06-01"
        },
        {
            "jurisdictionCode": "ES",
            "countryName": "Spain",
            "region": "europe",
            "testName": "Ley Rider + Labour Inspectorate",
            "enforcementLevel": "critical",
            "presumptionOfEmployment": true,
            "euPlatformWorkDirective": true,
            "lastUpdated": "2026-06-01"
        }
    ],
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false,
        "count": 2
    }
}
列出司法管辖区 — 代码片段

curl --location --request GET 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27159/list+jurisdictions?region=europe&enforcementLevel=critical&euPlatformWorkDirective=true' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 


    
请求
返回一个法域的完整信息,该法域通过其法域代码(不区分大小写)进行识别
Endpoint ID: 27161
GET https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27161/get+jurisdiction+profile
输入参数

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "jurisdictionCode": "US",
        "countryName": "United States (Federal)",
        "region": "americas",
        "testName": "IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities)",
        "testDescription": "The IRS applies a common law test examining behavioral control, financial control, and the type of relationship between the parties to determine whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor for federal tax purposes.",
        "presumptionOfEmployment": false,
        "euPlatformWorkDirective": false,
        "enforcementLevel": "medium",
        "enforcementNotes": "The Department of Labor paused its 2024 independent contractor rule in May 2025 and reverted to the pre-2024 economic realities framework. Enforcement remains agency-by-agency (IRS, DOL, NLRB) with no single unified federal test.",
        "penalties": {
            "backPayYears": 3,
            "taxLiabilityDescription": "Retroactive employer share of FICA/FUTA taxes, unpaid overtime under the FLSA, and potential loss of Section 530 safe-harbor relief.",
            "fineRange": "Varies by agency — IRS penalties plus DOL back-wage awards, typically uncapped",
            "criminalLiability": false,
            "notableCases": [
                "Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp. — landmark misclassification class action over benefits eligibility",
                "FedEx Ground driver misclassification settlements across multiple states"
            ]
        },
        "factors": [
            {
                "name": "behavioural_control",
                "weight": 25,
                "question": "Does the company control how the work is performed (behavioral control)?",
                "inputField": "companyControlsMethod",
                "employeeSignal": true,
                "explanation": "Instructing the worker on how, when, and where to do the work is the core behavioral control indicator under the IRS common law test."
            },
            {
                "name": "schedule_control",
                "weight": 15,
                "question": "Does the company set or control the worker's hours?",
                "inputField": "companyControlsHours",
                "employeeSignal": true,
                "explanation": "Company-set hours reinforce behavioral control and reduce the worker's independence."
            },
            {
                "name": "financial_risk",
                "weight": 20,
                "question": "Does the worker bear genuine profit-or-loss risk on the engagement?",
                "inputField": "workerBearsProfitLossRisk",
                "employeeSignal": false,
                "explanation": "Absence of profit-or-loss risk is a core financial control indicator supporting employee status."
            },
            {
                "name": "investment_in_tools",
                "weight": 15,
                "question": "Does the worker provide and invest in their own tools or equipment?",
                "inputField": "workerProvidesOwnTools",
                "employeeSignal": false,
                "explanation": "Reliance on company-provided tools is a financial control indicator supporting employee status."
            },
            {
                "name": "relationship_permanency",
                "weight": 15,
                "question": "Has the engagement continued for an extended, indefinite-feeling period?",
                "inputField": "engagementDurationMonths",
                "employeeSignal": ">=24",
                "explanation": "Long, open-ended engagements point toward an intended ongoing relationship rather than a discrete project."
            },
            {
                "name": "multiple_clients",
                "weight": 10,
                "question": "Does the worker provide similar services to multiple clients in the market?",
                "inputField": "workerHasMultipleClients",
                "employeeSignal": false,
                "explanation": "A worker serving only one company looks more like an employee than an independent business."
            }
        ],
        "lastUpdated": "2026-06-01",
        "partial": false
    },
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false
    }
}
获取司法管辖区概况 — 代码片段

curl --location --request GET 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27161/get+jurisdiction+profile&jurisdictionCode=Required' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 


    
请求
返回2-5个司法管辖区的测试 执法态度和处罚曝光的结构化并排比较 未解决的代码将返回在notFound数组中而不是失败请求
Endpoint ID: 27164
POST https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27164/compare+2-5+jurisdictions
输入参数

比较2-5个司法管辖区 — 端点功能

对象 描述
request_body 必需
请求体 必需 Json

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。


输入参数

此端点不需要任何输入参数。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "jurisdictions": [
            {
                "jurisdictionCode": "US",
                "countryName": "United States (Federal)",
                "testName": "IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities)",
                "enforcementLevel": "medium",
                "presumptionOfEmployment": false,
                "penaltyHighlights": {
                    "backPayYears": 3,
                    "criminalLiability": false,
                    "fineRange": "Varies by agency — IRS penalties plus DOL back-wage awards, typically uncapped"
                }
            },
            {
                "jurisdictionCode": "GB",
                "countryName": "United Kingdom",
                "testName": "IR35 / Off-Payroll Working Rules",
                "enforcementLevel": "critical",
                "presumptionOfEmployment": false,
                "penaltyHighlights": {
                    "backPayYears": 6,
                    "criminalLiability": false,
                    "fineRange": "Unlimited — HMRC recovers all unpaid tax plus interest"
                }
            }
        ],
        "notFound": [
            "XX"
        ]
    },
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false
    }
}
比较2-5个司法管辖区 — 代码片段

curl --location --request POST 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27164/compare+2-5+jurisdictions' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 

--data-raw ''

    
请求
返回某个司法管辖区的因素核对清单——每个问题及其答案所代表的信号——供买家构建自己的评估用户界面使用
Endpoint ID: 27166
GET https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27166/get+factor+checklist
输入参数

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "jurisdictionCode": "US",
        "countryName": "United States (Federal)",
        "testName": "IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities)",
        "factors": [
            {
                "name": "behavioural_control",
                "question": "Does the company control how the work is performed (behavioral control)?",
                "inputField": "companyControlsMethod",
                "employeeSignal": true,
                "weight": 25,
                "explanation": "Instructing the worker on how, when, and where to do the work is the core behavioral control indicator under the IRS common law test."
            },
            {
                "name": "schedule_control",
                "question": "Does the company set or control the worker's hours?",
                "inputField": "companyControlsHours",
                "employeeSignal": true,
                "weight": 15,
                "explanation": "Company-set hours reinforce behavioral control and reduce the worker's independence."
            },
            {
                "name": "financial_risk",
                "question": "Does the worker bear genuine profit-or-loss risk on the engagement?",
                "inputField": "workerBearsProfitLossRisk",
                "employeeSignal": false,
                "weight": 20,
                "explanation": "Absence of profit-or-loss risk is a core financial control indicator supporting employee status."
            },
            {
                "name": "investment_in_tools",
                "question": "Does the worker provide and invest in their own tools or equipment?",
                "inputField": "workerProvidesOwnTools",
                "employeeSignal": false,
                "weight": 15,
                "explanation": "Reliance on company-provided tools is a financial control indicator supporting employee status."
            },
            {
                "name": "relationship_permanency",
                "question": "Has the engagement continued for an extended, indefinite-feeling period?",
                "inputField": "engagementDurationMonths",
                "employeeSignal": ">=24",
                "weight": 15,
                "explanation": "Long, open-ended engagements point toward an intended ongoing relationship rather than a discrete project."
            },
            {
                "name": "multiple_clients",
                "question": "Does the worker provide similar services to multiple clients in the market?",
                "inputField": "workerHasMultipleClients",
                "employeeSignal": false,
                "weight": 10,
                "explanation": "A worker serving only one company looks more like an employee than an independent business."
            }
        ]
    },
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false
    }
}
获取因素检查表 — 代码片段

curl --location --request GET 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27166/get+factor+checklist&jurisdictionCode=Required' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 


    
请求
返回一个司法管辖区的最大处罚曝光:补偿年限 税务责任描述 罚款范围 刑事责任 和显著的执法案件
Endpoint ID: 27169
GET https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27169/get+penalty+exposure
输入参数

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "jurisdictionCode": "US",
        "countryName": "United States (Federal)",
        "testName": "IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities)",
        "enforcementLevel": "medium",
        "enforcementNotes": "The Department of Labor paused its 2024 independent contractor rule in May 2025 and reverted to the pre-2024 economic realities framework. Enforcement remains agency-by-agency (IRS, DOL, NLRB) with no single unified federal test.",
        "penalties": {
            "backPayYears": 3,
            "taxLiabilityDescription": "Retroactive employer share of FICA/FUTA taxes, unpaid overtime under the FLSA, and potential loss of Section 530 safe-harbor relief.",
            "fineRange": "Varies by agency — IRS penalties plus DOL back-wage awards, typically uncapped",
            "criminalLiability": false,
            "notableCases": [
                "Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp. — landmark misclassification class action over benefits eligibility",
                "FedEx Ground driver misclassification settlements across multiple states"
            ]
        }
    },
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false
    }
}
获得处罚曝光 — 代码片段

curl --location --request GET 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27169/get+penalty+exposure&jurisdictionCode=Required' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 


    
请求
根据每月费率、参与时长和工人数来估算被追讨的工资金额,限于该司法管辖区法定的追索窗口期。从不进行精算或法律计算
Endpoint ID: 27172
POST https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27172/estimate+financial+exposure
输入参数

估算财务风险 — 端点功能

对象 描述
request_body 必需
请求体 必需 Json

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。


输入参数

此端点不需要任何输入参数。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "jurisdictionCode": "MX",
        "currency": "USD",
        "backPayMonthsApplied": 12,
        "estimatedBackPayExposure": 180000,
        "additionalExposureNotes": {
            "taxLiabilityDescription": "Retroactive IMSS (social security) registration and contributions, INFONAVIT housing fund contributions, and statutory profit-sharing (PTU) liability.",
            "fineRange": "Fines from the STPS labour authority plus full statutory severance (liquidación) exposure if reclassification leads to termination disputes",
            "criminalLiability": false
        },
        "note": "Order-of-magnitude estimate for prioritisation only. Not an actuarial or legal calculation."
    },
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false
    }
}
估算财务风险 — 代码片段

curl --location --request POST 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27172/estimate+financial+exposure' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 

--data-raw ''

    
请求
运行评分引擎并返回可以降低风险的高影响变更的排名列表,提供赌注和理由,同时如果解决了所有列出的因素,预计得分。
Endpoint ID: 27175
POST https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27175/get+remediation+opportunities
输入参数

获取补救机会 — 端点功能

对象 描述
请求体 必需 Json

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。


输入参数

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "jurisdictionCode": "US",
        "currentRiskScore": 100,
        "currentRiskLevel": "critical",
        "opportunities": [
            {
                "factor": "behavioural_control",
                "pointsAtStake": 25,
                "suggestion": "Reduce company control over how the work is performed — let the worker determine their own methods and processes. Highest single-factor impact available."
            },
            {
                "factor": "schedule_control",
                "pointsAtStake": 15,
                "suggestion": "Reduce company control over the worker's hours — let the worker set their own schedule."
            }
        ],
        "projectedScoreIfAllAddressed": 60,
        "projectedRiskLevel": "high",
        "note": "This does not judge which factors are practically changeable — e.g. past engagement duration cannot be undone. Prioritise items that reflect the true working relationship, not just the paperwork."
    },
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false
    }
}
获取补救机会 — 代码片段

curl --location --request POST 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27175/get+remediation+opportunities' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 

--data-raw '{
  "jurisdictionCode": "US",
  "relationship": {
    "companyControlsMethod": true,
    "companyControlsHours": true
  }
}'

    
请求
返回保持管辖权得分低的目标关系档案 始终配有明确的警告 这不是法律保证
Endpoint ID: 27177
GET https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27177/get+safe-harbor+checklist
输入参数

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "jurisdictionCode": "US",
        "testName": "IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities)",
        "checklist": [
            {
                "factor": "behavioural_control",
                "inputField": "companyControlsMethod",
                "question": "Does the company control how the work is performed (behavioral control)?",
                "targetAnswer": false,
                "weight": 25,
                "explanation": "Instructing the worker on how, when, and where to do the work is the core behavioral control indicator under the IRS common law test."
            },
            {
                "factor": "schedule_control",
                "inputField": "companyControlsHours",
                "question": "Does the company set or control the worker's hours?",
                "targetAnswer": false,
                "weight": 15,
                "explanation": "Company-set hours reinforce behavioral control and reduce the worker's independence."
            },
            {
                "factor": "financial_risk",
                "inputField": "workerBearsProfitLossRisk",
                "question": "Does the worker bear genuine profit-or-loss risk on the engagement?",
                "targetAnswer": true,
                "weight": 20,
                "explanation": "Absence of profit-or-loss risk is a core financial control indicator supporting employee status."
            },
            {
                "factor": "investment_in_tools",
                "inputField": "workerProvidesOwnTools",
                "question": "Does the worker provide and invest in their own tools or equipment?",
                "targetAnswer": true,
                "weight": 15,
                "explanation": "Reliance on company-provided tools is a financial control indicator supporting employee status."
            },
            {
                "factor": "relationship_permanency",
                "inputField": "engagementDurationMonths",
                "question": "Has the engagement continued for an extended, indefinite-feeling period?",
                "targetAnswer": "<24",
                "weight": 15,
                "explanation": "Long, open-ended engagements point toward an intended ongoing relationship rather than a discrete project."
            },
            {
                "factor": "multiple_clients",
                "inputField": "workerHasMultipleClients",
                "question": "Does the worker provide similar services to multiple clients in the market?",
                "targetAnswer": true,
                "weight": 10,
                "explanation": "A worker serving only one company looks more like an employee than an independent business."
            }
        ],
        "caveat": "This profile describes the factor pattern associated with lower risk under this jurisdiction's test. It is not a guarantee of contractor status — classification is fact-specific."
    },
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false
    }
}
获取安全港清单 — 代码片段

curl --location --request GET 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27177/get+safe-harbor+checklist&jurisdictionCode=Required' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 


    
请求
返回所有20个司法管辖区中每个不同的法律测试家族,包括描述和使用每个测试家族的司法管辖区
Endpoint ID: 27181
GET https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27181/list+legal+test+families
输入参数

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。

此端点不需要任何输入参数。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": [
        {
            "testFamily": "Common Law Multi-Factor / Control Test",
            "description": "A judicially balanced, non-statutory-presumption indicia test rooted in English common law tradition, weighing control, ownership of tools, chance of profit, risk of loss, and integration, with no single factor determinative.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "US",
                    "testName": "IRS Common Law Test (Economic Realities)"
                },
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "CA",
                    "testName": "Common Law Multi-Factor"
                },
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "SG",
                    "testName": "Common Law + MOM Guidelines"
                },
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "NZ",
                    "testName": "Employment Relations Act"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "testFamily": "ABC Test",
            "description": "A statutory three-prong test that presumes employee status unless the hiring entity affirmatively proves all three prongs: freedom from control, work performed outside the usual course of business, and an independently established trade.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "US-CA",
                    "testName": "ABC Test (AB5 + AB1514)"
                },
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "US-NY",
                    "testName": "ABC Test"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "testFamily": "Control / IR35-Style Off-Payroll Test",
            "description": "A tax-authority-administered control test that shifts payroll withholding liability onto the hiring business itself once a contractor is found to fall inside the regime.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "GB",
                    "testName": "IR35 / Off-Payroll Working Rules"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "testFamily": "Economic Dependency / Presumption of Employment",
            "description": "A rebuttable statutory or directive-based presumption of employment triggered by control or economic-dependence indicators, placing the burden on the hiring company to prove genuine self-employment.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "EU",
                    "testName": "Economic Dependency / Platform Work Directive"
                },
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "ZA",
                    "testName": "Labour Relations Act"
                },
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "MX",
                    "testName": "Federal Labour Law"
                },
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "IE",
                    "testName": "Code of Practice on Determining Employment Status"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "testFamily": "Continental Labour Court Multi-Factor Test",
            "description": "A civil-code-rooted, court- or administratively-driven substance-over-form test weighing personal dependency, integration into the business, and instructional control.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "DE",
                    "testName": "Labour Court Multi-Factor Test"
                },
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "NL",
                    "testName": "DBA Act / Labour Court"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "testFamily": "Subordination Test with Aggressive Criminal/Administrative Enforcement",
            "description": "A subordination-link test — control, exclusivity, and economic dependence — paired with an active criminal or heavy administrative enforcement posture against non-compliant hiring companies.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "FR",
                    "testName": "Economic Dependence + Criminal Liability"
                },
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "ES",
                    "testName": "Ley Rider + Labour Inspectorate"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "testFamily": "Contract-Primacy Test",
            "description": "Characterises the relationship primarily by the written contract's terms rather than by conduct after the fact, unless the contract is shown to be a sham.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "AU",
                    "testName": "High Court Whole-of-Relationship Test"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "testFamily": "Civil Law Subordination Test",
            "description": "A civil-code subordination-link standard focused on direction and control, without the criminal-enforcement overlay seen in comparable subordination tests elsewhere.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "CA-QC",
                    "testName": "Civil Law Framework"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "testFamily": "Statutory Licensing & Supervision Test",
            "description": "A statutory regime centred on principal-employer supervision, the perennial nature of the work, and licensing obligations, enforced unevenly across sub-national authorities.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "IN",
                    "testName": "Contract Labour Act"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "testFamily": "Strict Element-Based Deeming Test (CLT)",
            "description": "Employment is deemed to exist automatically once subordination, habitual continuity, and personal, non-delegable service are jointly shown, regardless of contract form or the parties' intent.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "BR",
                    "testName": "CLT (Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho)"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "testFamily": "Instruction-Based Substance Test (Rodosho Criteria)",
            "description": "An administrative multi-factor test examining whether the worker receives specific instructions, can refuse work, and retains discretion over hours and location.",
            "jurisdictionsUsing": [
                {
                    "jurisdictionCode": "JP",
                    "testName": "Labour Standards Act"
                }
            ]
        }
    ],
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false,
        "count": 11
    }
}
列出法律测试家族 — 代码片段

curl --location --request GET 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27181/list+legal+test+families' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 


    
请求
返回各个管辖区最近的规则和执行态度变化,最新的优先按管辖区代码和日期过滤
Endpoint ID: 27183
GET https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27183/get+changelog
输入参数

获取更新日志 — 端点功能

对象 描述
jurisdictionCode 可选 Optional. Filter to a single jurisdiction's changes.
since 可选 Optional. ISO date — return only changes on or after this date.

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。


输入参数

jurisdictionCode
since
API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "success": true,
    "data": [],
    "meta": {
        "disclaimer": "Classification results are indicative only and do not constitute legal advice. Worker classification is fact-specific and jurisdiction-dependent. Always consult qualified legal counsel before making classification decisions.",
        "cached": false,
        "count": 0
    }
}
获取更新日志 — 代码片段

curl --location --request GET 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27183/get+changelog?jurisdictionCode=US&since=2026-01-01' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 


    
请求
返回服务正常运行时间 版本 总管辖区数量 端点数量 和配置最后更新时间 这些信息都是从加载的配置中实时提取的 不受源保护身份验证的限制
Endpoint ID: 27188
GET https://docs.zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27188/health+check
输入参数

剩余免费测试请求:3 / 3。

此端点不需要任何输入参数。

API 示例响应
JSON
{
    "status": "ok",
    "uptime": 5233.326406247,
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "totalJurisdictions": 20,
    "endpointCount": 15,
    "configLastUpdated": "2026-06-01"
}
健康检查 — 代码片段

curl --location --request GET 'https://zylalabs.com/api/13222/misclassification+risk+evaluation+global+worker+classification+intelligence+api/27188/health+check' --header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' 


    

API 访问密钥和身份验证

注册后,每个开发者都会被分配一个个人 API 访问密钥,这是一个唯一的字母和数字组合,用于访问我们的 API 端点。要使用 误分类风险评估全球工人分类智能 API 进行身份验证,只需在 Authorization 标头中包含您的 bearer token。

标头
标头 描述
授权 必需 应为 Bearer access_key. 订阅后,请查看上方的"您的 API 访问密钥"。

无长期承诺。随时升级、降级或取消。 免费试用包括最多 50 个请求。

🚀 企业版套餐

起价
$ 10,000/年


  • 自定义数量
  • 自定义速率限制
  • 专业客户支持
  • 实时 API 监控
zeiss-logo amazon-logo zoom-logo decathlon-logo

领先企业的信赖之选

概览

接受有关工作关系的结构化描述,并返回特定于管辖区的错误分类风险评分(0-100),风险水平,逐因分析,以及在20个管辖区内的通俗解释。还包括补救指导,安全港检查清单,财务风险估算,跨管辖区比较和投资组合级别的批量评分。没有数据库,没有运行时抓取 - 快速和确定的响应

误分类风险评估全球工人分类智能 API FAQs

每个端点返回与工人分类相关的结构化数据,包括风险评分、风险级别、因素分析和推理。例如“分类单一关系”端点为特定管辖区提供风险评分、覆盖率和详细因素细分

关键字段包括“风险评分”、“风险级别”、“覆盖范围”、“推理”和“因素”。每个因素包含如“名称”、“问题”、“答案”和“信号”等详细信息,这些帮助用户理解分类结果

响应数据以JSON格式组织,其中包含表示请求状态的“success”标志,后面跟着一个包含结果的“data”对象。每个结果包括特定于管辖区的详细信息、风险评估和因素分析

参数因端点而异。例如,“对单一关系进行分类”端点需要工作关系的结构化描述,而“跨多个管辖区进行分类”端点接受多个管辖区代码进行比较

用户可以通过提供有关工作关系的具体细节,例如管辖区代码和要分类的关系数量,来自定义请求。这允许根据独特场景进行量身定制的评估

数据来源于与各法域相关的法律框架和分类测试 API不实时抓取数据 确保基于既定法律标准的确定性回复

典型的使用案例包括评估独立承包商的误分类风险 评估遵循劳动法的合规性 以及审计承包商投资组合以识别潜在的责任

如果结果部分或为空,API将返回一个“错误”数组,指示无效条目。用户应查看错误消息以纠正任何问题,例如不支持的司法管辖区代码,然后再重新提交请求

一般常见问题

Zyla API Hub 就像一个大型 API 商店,您可以在一个地方找到数千个 API。我们还为所有 API 提供专门支持和实时监控。注册后,您可以选择要使用的 API。请记住,每个 API 都需要自己的订阅。但如果您订阅多个 API,您将为所有这些 API 使用相同的密钥,使事情变得更简单。
价格以 USD(美元)、EUR(欧元)、CAD(加元)、AUD(澳元)和 GBP(英镑)列出。我们接受所有主要的借记卡和信用卡。我们的支付系统使用最新的安全技术,由 Stripe 提供支持,Stripe 是世界上最可靠的支付公司之一。如果您在使用卡片付款时遇到任何问题,请通过 [email protected]

此外,如果您已经以这些货币中的任何一种(USD、EUR、CAD、AUD、GBP)拥有有效订阅,该货币将保留用于后续订阅。只要您没有任何有效订阅,您可以随时更改货币。
定价页面上显示的本地货币基于您 IP 地址的国家/地区,仅供参考。实际价格以 USD(美元)为单位。当您付款时,即使您在我们的网站上看到以本地货币显示的等值金额,您的卡片对账单上也会以美元显示费用。这意味着您不能直接使用本地货币付款。
有时,银行可能会因其欺诈保护设置而拒绝收费。我们建议您首先联系您的银行,检查他们是否阻止了我们的收费。此外,您可以访问账单门户并更改关联的卡片以进行付款。如果这些方法不起作用并且您需要进一步帮助,请通过 [email protected]
价格由月度或年度订阅决定,具体取决于所选计划。
API 调用根据成功请求从您的计划中扣除。每个计划都包含您每月可以进行的特定数量的调用。只有成功的调用(由状态 200 响应指示)才会计入您的总数。这确保失败或不完整的请求不会影响您的月度配额。
Zyla API Hub 采用月度订阅系统。您的计费周期将从您购买付费计划的那一天开始,并在下个月的同一日期续订。因此,如果您想避免未来的费用,请提前取消订阅。
要升级您当前的订阅计划,只需转到 API 的定价页面并选择您要升级到的计划。升级将立即生效,让您立即享受新计划的功能。请注意,您之前计划中的任何剩余调用都不会转移到新计划,因此在升级时请注意这一点。您将被收取新计划的全部金额。
要检查您本月剩余多少 API 调用,请参考响应标头中的 "X-Zyla-API-Calls-Monthly-Remaining" 字段。例如,如果您的计划允许每月 1,000 个请求,而您已使用 100 个,则响应标头中的此字段将显示 900 个剩余调用。
要查看您的计划允许的最大 API 请求数,请检查 "X-Zyla-RateLimit-Limit" 响应标头。例如,如果您的计划包括每月 1,000 个请求,此标头将显示 1,000。
"X-Zyla-RateLimit-Reset" 标头显示您的速率限制重置之前的秒数。这告诉您何时您的请求计数将重新开始。例如,如果它显示 3,600,则意味着还有 3,600 秒直到限制重置。
是的,您可以随时通过访问您的账户并在账单页面上选择取消选项来取消您的计划。请注意,升级、降级和取消会立即生效。此外,取消后,您将不再有权访问该服务,即使您的配额中还有剩余调用。
为了让您有机会在没有任何承诺的情况下体验我们的 API,我们提供 7 天免费试用,允许您免费进行最多 50 次 API 调用。此试用只能使用一次,因此我们建议将其应用于您最感兴趣的 API。虽然我们的大多数 API 都提供免费试用,但有些可能不提供。试用在 7 天后或您进行了 50 次请求后结束,以先发生者为准。如果您在试用期间达到 50 次请求限制,您需要"开始您的付费计划"以继续发出请求。您可以在个人资料中的订阅 -> 选择您订阅的 API -> 定价标签下找到"开始您的付费计划"按钮。或者,如果您在第 7 天之前不取消订阅,您的免费试用将结束,您的计划将自动计费,授予您访问计划中指定的所有 API 调用的权限。请记住这一点以避免不必要的费用。
7 天后,您将被收取试用期间订阅的计划的全额费用。因此,在试用期结束前取消很重要。因忘记及时取消而提出的退款请求不被接受。
当您订阅 API 免费试用时,您可以进行最多 50 次 API 调用。如果您希望超出此限制进行额外的 API 调用,API 将提示您执行"开始您的付费计划"。您可以在个人资料中的订阅 -> 选择您订阅的 API -> 定价标签下找到"开始您的付费计划"按钮。
付款订单在每月 20 日至 30 日之间处理。如果您在 20 日之前提交请求,您的付款将在此时间范围内处理。
您可以通过我们的聊天渠道联系我们以获得即时帮助。我们始终在线,时间为上午 8 点至下午 5 点(EST)。如果您在该时间之后联系我们,我们将尽快回复您。此外,您可以通过 [email protected]

相关 API